< Back to easements list
Compare with previous version →

Easement 701318

Implemented by TransPennine Express (TP)

Human-readable text

This map easement is to accommodate engineering diversions of TransPennine Express services via Wakefield Kirkgate. It applies in both directions.

Electronic easements

This easement has 3 associated electronic records.

Positive

  • Elec. easement 703515 — Map

    From 2025-02-14 on all days

    When…

    • using TOCs { TransPennine Express (TP) }

    If all of the below apply to the journey:

    • journey diverges from a mapped route, and its divergence is through nodes { Castleford [CFD] Deighton [DHN] Huddersfield [HUD] Leeds [LDS] Micklefield [MIK] Mirfield [MIR] Normanton [NOR] Selby [SBY] Woodlesford [WDS] Wakefield Kirkgate [WKK] }
    • does not pass through any of { Crewe [CRE] Stoke-On-Trent [SOT] }

    then the journey may be considered valid, despite not following a mapped route

  • Elec. easement 704099 — Map

    From 2025-02-14 on all days

    If all of the below apply to the journey:

    • journey diverges from a mapped route, and its divergence is through nodes { Deighton [DHN] Huddersfield [HUD] Leeds [LDS] Micklefield [MIK] Mirfield [MIR] Normanton [NOR] Selby [SBY] Woodlesford [WDS] Wakefield Kirkgate [WKK] }
    • starts at { Preston (Lancs) [PRE] }
    • ends at { Beverley [BEV] }
    • does not pass through any of { Crewe [CRE] Stoke-On-Trent [SOT] }

    then the journey may be considered valid, despite not following a mapped route

  • Elec. easement 704100 — Map

    From 2025-02-14 on all days

    If all of the below apply to the journey:

    • journey diverges from a mapped route, and its divergence is through nodes { Castleford [CFD] Deighton [DHN] Huddersfield [HUD] Leeds [LDS] Micklefield [MIK] Mirfield [MIR] Normanton [NOR] Selby [SBY] Selby [SBY] Woodlesford [WDS] Wakefield Kirkgate [WKK] }
    • starts at { Beverley [BEV] }
    • ends at { Preston (Lancs) [PRE] }
    • does not pass through any of { Crewe [CRE] Stoke-On-Trent [SOT] }

    then the journey may be considered valid, despite not following a mapped route

Negative

  • There are no negative easement records